User login

Ben Witherington and Guns

In April, a lone student at Virginia Tech strode around the halls of his campus and slaughtered thirty-two unarmed people before killing himself. In response, Dr. Ben Witherington of Asbury Theological Seminary trotted out a meandering argument that Christians should support gun control. BW3 simultaneously demonstrated a misunderstanding of firearms, U.S. Constitutional history, and the impact of gun control laws in other countries. He did, however, demonstrate a basic gist of Christian pacifism, which he seems to advocate as foundational for U.S. national policy...somehow. It's unclear exactly what the point of BW3's post was, or how pacifism would have benefitted the students at Virginia Tech. Which brings us up last Sunday, when an armed civilian stopped a rampaging killer in his tracks, thereby preventing even greater slaughter. Under Witherington's proposal, this woman would not have had been able to stop the killer. The facts are very inconvenient for Witherington's thesis. In today's post, he asserts that private gun ownership does not get at the root of the problem: First, I doubt any of us would dispute the notion that much of our society is frankly not well, indeed more unwell today than at any time I can remember in my lifetime. Between the mall shooting in Nebraska and the Colorado shootings it must seem like open season on innocent people, including Christians. Let me be clear however--- THE SOURCE OF THIS PROBLEM IS NOT THE LACK OF GUNS IN THE HANDS OF GOOD PEOPLE. The source of the problem is the sickness in our society, as it becomes less and less Christian, and thereby less and less human or humane. And all of us who have failed to share the love of Christ with mentally ill people, and get them the psychiatric help they need must accept some responsibility for what happens as our society goes south. Gee golly willickers! The problem is that our society is unwell! Let's just pass a law that society is to be well from now on, and then we don't need guns to protect ourselves from those pesky killers anymore! All that we have to do is properly diagnose every psychiactric illness of every person who has one and treat it properly, and there's no need for guns at all. Surely we can manage a 100% success rate? BW3 goes on to say that countries with strict gun control laws don't have problems like this, but does not name any countries or cite any statistics or sources. And preferring to second-guess people being shot at, he offers this platitude devoid of any policy application: Ours is a sick society. And until we realize that more guns are not the answer to the problem, we have not owned up to the sickness, nor what really makes for a cure. Jesus came to spread God's love and grace-- 'as far as the curse is found'. True, but unhelpful to the people who people who died at Virgina Tech and in Colorado Springs.

unwell

I agree with the first commenter: BW3 is correct to say our society is sick. Both gun control advocates and gun rights advocates like to cherry pick their data. England has stricter gun laws than we do, and has lower murder rates. Switzerland has higher gun ownership than we do, and has lower murder rates. When you look at all the data, what emerges is that the U.S. has a higher rate of homicide than most other industrial nations. The problem isn't going to go away by putting guns in the hands of more citizens, but neither will it disappear by limiting access to guns. Our society's level of violence is a symptom of a spiritual disease, and if we don't treat the underlying cause the symptoms will never get better. BruceA

Johnny, Johnny, Johnny

I love and respect you, and appreciate how willing you are to let your opinions be known. I'm afraid, however, that BW3's post has hit your libertarian hair-trigger and this rant just isn't up to your usual high standards. (We're all guilty of it from time to time, BTW) I believe you have misrepresented BW3's opinions in your somewhat snarky responses. He claimed that the society is unwell, not that legislatively mandating psychiatric treatment for individuals will necessarily make society well. And I really don't see how his claim that the problem of gun violence is a problem on a deeper, systemic level is somehow "second-guess(ing) the people being shot at." That just does not follow. I believe this statement - "Ours is a sick society. And until we realize that more guns are not the answer to the problem, we have not owned up to the sickness, nor what really makes for a cure. Jesus came to spread God's love and grace-- 'as far as the curse is found,'" has more to do with church policy than public policy. Of course it has no public policy application, but I believe that BW3 is correct to indict the church for getting love and grace wrong (yes we, the church, have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God). As the church, not as pubic policy-makers, we certainly know people in our neighborhoods who need God's love, God's grace and God's help. Everybody in our congregations knows someone who is "a little creepy" or "just odd." And are we reaching out to these lost ones, or are we ignoring them - or worse?
Syndicate content