Original post at http://entertherainbow.blogspot.com/2012/11/diverse-is-different-than-divided-2012.html
I must say, after Tuesday’s election, most of us seem to be …
just fine. Of course, there is a distinct minority of Americans which is not just
fine, and within that minority there are two sub-groups: people who are
ecstatic and people who are appalled.
The ecstatics are ecstatic because President Obama was
re-elected and now all is right with the world.
The appalleds are appalled because President Obama was
re-elected and now our nation is hopelessly doomed to oblivion.
Neither outlook is truthful, and that’s why most of us are
just fine. We know we’re not great; there is a lot of work that needs to be
done, so we’re not really ecstatic. We know we’re not horrible; things have
been and could be a lot worse than they are, so we’re not really appalled.
And of course there are degrees of “just fine-ness,” with
some of us on the pleased end of the scale and some on the disappointed end. And
there is variety within the spectrum of “just fine,” depending on if you are
talking local, state, or national levels.
The “just fines” voted Republican, Democrat, Libertarian,
Green, and the rest. Some of our candidates won, and some lost. Some of our
ballot initiatives passed, and some didn’t. Some of our amendments amended, and
some didn’t. And so it goes.
And “just fine” doesn’t equal “weak” or “ambivalent” or “disengaged,”
by the way. Many of the “just fines” are energetic, passionate people who care
deeply for our communities, our states, and our nation. We’re just realistic
about it, and by realistic I mean this:
We understand the difference between “divided” and “diverse.”
If Tuesday’s election did nothing else, it reinforced the
idea that the United States of America is a diverse nation. The “ecstatics” and
the “appalleds” want to talk about how divided we are, but I don’t think that
is accurate. Our nation is not divided, it is diverse, and there is a big
There are times it feels divided, but the problem lies with
the system, which is currently structured in such a way that the myth of the
divided nation is perpetuated. One of the changes I wish for is the immediate
elevation in significance of multiple alternative political parties, so that
the system more accurately reflects the diversity of our nation, and provides a
process by which we can choose from among a more diverse set of platforms.
Just for example, this year I was struck by the number of
people with whom I communicated who expressed the core of the Libertarian Party
platform. Though not a clinical survey, it seemed to me that a fiscally conservative
approach that emphasizes personal freedom, including the freedom to marry
whomever one chooses, was fairly common. However, neither the Democratic nor the
Republican platforms fully reflected this perspective, so the people who felt
that way were forced to compromise something of their values if they wanted to
feel as if their vote counted for something.
We should never have to choose between feeling like our vote
counts and feeling like our vote fully reflects our values. Many of the “just
fines” vote for people rather than party already. Last Tuesday, I personally
voted for candidates representing three different parties. I think it would be
very healthy to bring more voices into the conversation, more perspectives,
more philosophies from which to choose, and not automatically consider these alternative
parties to be “fringe” or “extreme” or any other dismissive label, but rather
legitimate perspectives that we could hear, understand, and then choose, or not.
However, all in all, I’m just fine. Our nation is just fine.
So is our state and our town. My president is a Democrat, my U.S. senators are
Republican and Democrat, my U.S. representative is a Republican, my governor is
a Democrat, my state representative is a Republican. See, just fine. Not
ecstatic, not appalling.
There is a difference between divided and diverse. Our
nation is not divided, we are diverse, and I for one love it that way.